Jump to content
LAST CHANCE - PALM TALK ACCESS INFORMATION - CLICK HERE ×
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

Long time I wondered how to make the difference between Dypsis leptocheilos and Dypsis lastelliana:

Recently I could notice that the seedlings are completely different but after my last visit to Thabit's garden, I think I am now able to recognize a Dypsis lastelliana:

The trunk is more green than leptocheilos which trunk is grey, the crownshaft has more bluish purple color in the brown, and the leaves are growing upwards.

For me, Dypsis lastelliana is far nicer than Dypsis leptocheilos, I must uproot the 15 leptocheilos I planted last year and destroy the 50 seedlings I got :winkie:

Here pics of Dypsis lastelliana in Thabit's garden:

post-6735-0-97003000-1388751120_thumb.jppost-6735-0-81262000-1388751143_thumb.jppost-6735-0-60619000-1388751433_thumb.jp
post-6735-0-13985700-1388751169_thumb.jppost-6735-0-12133000-1388751187_thumb.jppost-6735-0-46818400-1388751203_thumb.jp

5809129ecff1c_P1010385copie3.JPG.15aa3f5

Philippe

 

Jungle Paradise in Sri Lanka

 

Posted

I wish I could get Hybrids of the two.!! Lepto's grow fine here while lasty's struggle.. I would hope a hybrid would be excellent.!

Zone 10a at best after 2007 AND 2013, on SW facing hill, 1 1/2 miles from coast in Oceanside, CA. 30-98 degrees, and 45-80deg. about 95% of the time.

"The great workman of nature is time."   ,  "Genius is nothing but a great aptitude for patience."

-George-Louis Leclerc de Buffon-

I do some experiments and learning in my garden with palms so you don't have to experience the pain! Look at my old threads to find various observations and tips!

Posted

I agree that Dypsis Lastelliana is a much nicer plant in the tropics.

However, I am not sure what you posted here are Lastelliana. They look like Leptocheilos to me. Maybe others will chime in though and give their opinion as I don't see many Lastelliana's.

Len

Vista, CA (Zone 10a)

Shadowridge Area

"Show me your garden and I shall tell you what you are."

-- Alfred Austin

Posted

I agree that Dypsis Lastelliana is a much nicer plant in the tropics.

However, I am not sure what you posted here are Lastelliana. They look like Leptocheilos to me. Maybe others will chime in though and give their opinion as I don't see many Lastelliana's.

I had the same thought as Len - I would defer to others with more expertise, but the pics look like D. leptocheilos to me. My first experience with a mature D. lastelliana was in a garden in Hawaii pictured below. The Lastelliana is left of center. These always impressed me as being more massive and having more upright fronds, as compared to our Leptoceilios with fronds that come to the horizontal.

D. lastelliana:

post-3609-0-99669600-1388771074_thumb.jp

D. leptoceilios:

post-3609-0-09992000-1388771173_thumb.jp

gmp

Posted

I too think that the palms pictured are D. leptocheilos.

Hahaha. I was just looking for my pic of the same spot at Bo's with the D. lastelliana next to the driveway when you posted yours. funny

Matt Bradford

"Manambe Lavaka"

Spring Valley, CA (8.5 miles inland from San Diego Bay)

10B on the hill (635 ft. elevation)

9B in the canyon (520 ft. elevation)

Posted

I have to agree, D. lastelliana seem to have more upright leaflets. And the color on the ones posted

seem more like my largest D. leptoceilios. For me lepto's grow much faster than D. lastellianas.

Posted

Another set of younger specimens.

D. lastelliana on the right (JD Andersen garden, HI):

post-3609-0-49275300-1388774664_thumb.jp

D. leptoceilios (our farm, HI):

post-3609-0-39719100-1388774713_thumb.jp

gmp

Posted

These two were/are notoriously confused. This confusion/mis-naming goes so far back it is almost ingrained. I still blurt out the wrong name sometimes having been taught them wrong from the start many years ago.

I'm with Len. The ones posted in post #1 are D. leptos.

The distinguishing features for me are more orange fuzz for D. leptos and more dark maroon for D. lastellies. And the much more upright fronds on D. lastellies. And as already noted, the D. lepto is not as large.

But both are incredible palms when grown to perfection, with D. lepto more forgiving in less tropical locations - IMO.

animated-volcano-image-0010.gif.71ccc48bfc1ec622a0adca187eabaaa4.gif

Kona, on The Big Island
Hawaii - Land of Volcanoes

Posted

I have 15 year old specimens of both. I always thought the one on the left with more upright fronds was Dysis Leptocheilos, and the one on the right was Dypsis Lastelliana. But I could be wrong!

post-9296-0-65993600-1388787645_thumb.jp

post-9296-0-62440000-1388787777_thumb.jp

Posted

I think you've got them mixed up Steve. D. lastelliana on left, D. leptocheilos on right.

Matt Bradford

"Manambe Lavaka"

Spring Valley, CA (8.5 miles inland from San Diego Bay)

10B on the hill (635 ft. elevation)

9B in the canyon (520 ft. elevation)

Posted

I agree...Phillipe's photos are of D.leptocheilos. Steve's photos have D.lastelliana on the left and D.leptocheilos on the right.

Apart from the darker fur colouration, shorter petiole length, slightly broader leaflets and greener petioles, the easiest way to identify D.lastelliana compared to D.leptocheilos, is the trunk. Mature plants usually have a much more swollen trunk base, and the leaf scars are much broader...not the internodes between scars, but the actual scars...typically D.leptocheilos leaf scars are less than one centimetre wide, whereas D.lastelliana are typically 2-4 centimetres wide...hope this makes sense

Daryl

Gold Coast, Queensland Latitude 28S. Mild, Humid Subtropical climate. Rainfall - not consistent enough!

Posted

post-4111-0-41302700-1366372433_thumb.jppost-4111-0-37294400-1366372487_thumb.jp As I was reminded from a mistaken post I made last year, this is D. leptocheilos.

Cindy Adair

Posted

This is my much smaller (planted by me, as opposed to prexisting on my farm when I bought it) D. lastelliana. At least that's the label on this one at planting time in 2009....

Thanks so much to all for reinforcing the differences and for all the great photos. I like them both!

post-4111-0-71672700-1388797023_thumb.jp

Cindy Adair

Posted

Leaf scars on D.lastelliana trunk

post-42-0-58390800-1388797797_thumb.jpg

Leaf scars on D.leptocheilos trunk

post-42-0-02870400-1388797853_thumb.jpg

Petiole colour/length of D.lastelliana

post-42-0-97700300-1388797864_thumb.jpg

  • Upvote 1

Gold Coast, Queensland Latitude 28S. Mild, Humid Subtropical climate. Rainfall - not consistent enough!

Posted

Many thanks, Daryl. The leafbase scar dimension is the clearest and most useful difference for me, ( I see these palms infrequently).

San Francisco, California

Posted

Thanks Daryl!

Cindy Adair

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...