Jump to content
SUPER IMPORTANT - MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS TO PALMTALK - PLEASE READ ×
PalmTalk CLOSED FOR UPGRADE - May 14, 3am Eastern (US) 2-4 hours ×
WARNING-DON’T FORGET-PUT CURRENT EMAIL IN YOUR PROFILE ×
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Chamaedorea costaricana OR seifrizii ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have  grown a few batches from these mother palms in south Tampa on Swann. They take cold down to mid 20’s under canopy at my place and in 25gal containers have grown 10’ plus. How does one tell the difference between the two? 

IMG_1379.jpeg

IMG_1378.jpeg

IMG_1377.jpeg

IMG_1365.jpeg

  • Like 5
Posted

It's C. seifrizii. Very easy to difference them. C. costaricana looks like a slightly smaller version of C. tepejilote. But it's still very robust, and their flower/fruit bracts hang, while C. seifrizii bracts are erect. Also the ligules, only 2 species of Chamaedorea (including costaricana) have ligules. And the location too, to my knowledge, C. costaricana can't grow in Florida's soil due to nematodes or sandy soil, while C. seifrizii can tolerate FLA soil.

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 2
Posted

I agree with @idontknowhatnametuse - C. costaricana has very attractive, wide leaflets, closer to C. tepejilote than any of the usual Chams you seen in Florida. Unfortunately the last statement rings true as well, as this one has languished in the ground, I don't know if it's the soil or the heat, since this is a fairly high elevation species. 

C. seifrizii is from the Yucatan and can adapt to full sun in Florida, although it looks nicer in the shade. I've frustratingly had a lot of fungal issues with this one in the landscape however. They seem to fare better when they get some sun on the leaves so they can dry out more quickly in the summer. 

PXL_20241017_192320802.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, aabell said:

I agree with @idontknowhatnametuse - C. costaricana has very attractive, wide leaflets, closer to C. tepejilote than any of the usual Chams you seen in Florida. Unfortunately the last statement rings true as well, as this one has languished in the ground, I don't know if it's the soil or the heat, since this is a fairly high elevation species. 

C. seifrizii is from the Yucatan and can adapt to full sun in Florida, although it looks nicer in the shade. I've frustratingly had a lot of fungal issues with this one in the landscape however. They seem to fare better when they get some sun on the leaves so they can dry out more quickly in the summer. 

PXL_20241017_192320802.jpg

Thank you both 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, idontknowhatnametuse said:

Also the ligules, only 2 species of Chamaedorea (including costaricana) have ligules. 

I believe that the second species, C. quezalteca has been reduced to synonymy within C.  costa-ricana.   :)

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

San Francisco, California

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...