Jump to content
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks more kentiopsis oliviformis, but kinda looks archontophoenix to me. Can that be a possibility?

Posted

A friend gave me a bunch of palms from his yard that look just like that. They were Archontophoenix Maxima and A. Pupurae. My smal Kentiopsis has fine leaflets , not so wide. Lanceolata are much darker green and super wide leaflets like Chembroynia. Time will tell. Harry

  • Like 1
Posted

Here’s  a couple of Lancelota seedlings I have if it helps better I’d them. Plus an oliverformis I have in the garden. They do look like archontophoenix purpurea. 

IMG_2889.jpeg

IMG_2888.jpeg

IMG_2891.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, happypalms said:

Here’s  a couple of Lancelota seedlings I have if it helps better I’d them. Plus an oliverformis I have in the garden. They do look like archontophoenix purpurea. 

IMG_2889.jpeg

IMG_2888.jpeg

IMG_2891.jpeg

Which is the first picture?

Posted
15 hours ago, Palmiz said:

Looks more kentiopsis oliviformis, but kinda looks archontophoenix to me. Can that be a possibility?

It could be all three I had lost my laceolota and this was almost 2 years ago I was hoping this was it it was before I tagged everything 

Posted
1 hour ago, Jungle 9 said:

Which is the first picture?

The first two pics are lanceolata.

Posted

Chambeyronia Oliviformis, (formerly known as Kentiopsis Oliviformis) develops a heel, the others do not.  The chambeyronia will have thicker more waxy leaves than the others.  Sometimes you have to wait for them to develop more to differentiate them.

Formerly in Gilbert AZ, zone 9a/9b. Now in Palmetto, Florida Zone 9b/10a??

 

Tom Blank

Posted

Here is a small C. oliviformis. I think they lose those bifid leafs pretty early. IMG_4539.thumb.jpeg.35d15c48570c8dd178b189362eb9437d.jpeg

and a slightly larger one.

IMG_4538.thumb.jpeg.3bc965447d0e4bb21cf9fcfcc21d81b4.jpeg
Here is the youngest Archontophoenix I could find in the yard. 
IMG_4540.thumb.jpeg.5a54e6b0eab489c18241d56df8b3f497.jpeg
 

I looked around for a photo of a similar sized C lanceolata but I couldn't find one. I’m thinking some type of Archontophoenix also. Lanceolata doesn't usually have that uniform color like the palms in your photos. The stems and leaf bases are sort of olive colored or even pinkish. Also what ever the smaller midribs or veins are called? Those aren’t clearly visible in C. lanceolata but they are easily seen on the palms in your photos. Anyway, not a professional opinion.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...