Jump to content
IPS 2025 SAVE THE SPECIES - Please Check It Out - Click Here For Video & Info ×
Monitor Donation Goal Progress of SAVE THE SPECIES - Click Here ×
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

I acknowledge that any palm is better than no palm.  That said - if one palm species suddenly disappeared from everyone's yard forever - which species would you be the least sad to lose?

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Phoenix theophrasti    ( I recognize that some will value this palm for its frost hardiness. )  :hmm:  

  Most of the images online show a traditional single trunked palm, but as a juvenile it will sprout myriad growth points, producing an incoherent mess. 

It  is so viciously armed that it is hazardous to attempt pruning.

  • Like 6
  • Upvote 1

San Francisco, California

Posted

That's a tough question but I would have to go with Sabal Palmetto.

  • Like 2
Posted

Mine is Syagrus romanoffzia.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted

Washingtonia r's, Phoenix, -of any kind- ( except maybe a few Pygmys/ rupicola ), ..and Queens.. Forbidden on/ will get the " Savage Chain Saw Treatment " if on my property.. Trunks will be left for the Owls, wild Parrots, and Woodpeckers however.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Silas_Sancona said:

Washingtonia r's, Phoenix, -of any kind- ( except maybe a few Pygmys/ rupicola ), ..and Queens.. Forbidden on/ will get the " Savage Chain Saw Treatment " if on my property.. Trunks will be left for the Owls, wild Parrots, and Woodpeckers however.

Hey man you supposed to pick one species!  You picked like 14! :floor:

Edited by ahosey01
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, ahosey01 said:

Hey man you supposed to pick one species!  You picked like 14! :floor:

yup..;)

Posted

I also hate Phoenix Theophrasti.. Ugly, ugly, ugly.. 

But I have two Sabal Palmettos which I like.. They're rare here in Spain which I guess makes them slightly more desirable. I prefer them over Washingtonia Filifera (common here) any day... 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

My choice would be Trachycarpus fortunei - at least locally here in Texas.   Here is an example of one that unfortunately is somewhat typical:

578e806a222f5_Trachycarpusfortunei.JPG.416fff0550deb1b88b2a75eac0f8959d.JPG

Edited by Fusca
  • Like 5
  • Upvote 1

Jon Sunder

Posted
1 minute ago, Fusca said:

My choice would be Trachycarpus fortunei - at least locally here in Texas.  

I would agree with this, except I think it’s really cool seeing pics of them with snow on them knowing it’s not going to lead to total defoliation. But in terms of form and structure and how much they excite me and how commonly they’re planted, I’d agree.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ahosey01 said:

I would agree with this, except I think it’s really cool seeing pics of them with snow on them knowing it’s not going to lead to total defoliation. But in terms of form and structure and how much they excite me and how commonly they’re planted, I’d agree.

Around here they look best covered with snow, but that happens only every 20 years or so and doesn't usually last through the afternoon!

Jon Sunder

Posted

Washingtonia robusta.... They sprout everywhere and most of them never get trimmed and trunks cleaned. When they get too large, they often get removed because people don't want to pay to maintain them.

  • Like 2
Posted

I dont have a robusta, but they are hazardous when it comes to winds because they have the potential to fall over. I like my queens though.

  • Like 2

Palms - 1 Bismarckia nobilis, 2 Butia odorataBxJ1 BxJxBxS1 BxSChamaerops humilis1 Chambeyronia macrocarpa, 1 Chamaedorea microspadix1 Hyophorbe lagenicaulis1 Hyophorbe verschaffeltiiLivistona chinensis1 Livistona nitida, 1 Phoenix canariensis2 Phoenix roebeleniiRavenea rivularis1 Rhapis excelsa1 Sabal bermudanaSabal palmetto4 Syagrus romanzoffianaTrachycarpus fortunei4 Washingtonia robusta
Total: 39

Posted

Trachycarpus. Go away!

Seems people most hate the palm/s that are commonly grown the next zone down from them...

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, sipalms said:

Trachycarpus. Go away!

Seems people most hate the palm/s that are commonly grown the next zone down from them...

There are some seriously attractive Trachycarpus.  Unfortunately, they aren't the commonly grown ones.

Ben Rogers

On the border of Concord & Clayton in the East Bay hills - Elev 387 ft 37.95 °N, 121.94 °W

My back yard weather station: http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/hdfForecast?query=37.954%2C-121.945&sp=KCACONCO37

Posted

A healthy old queen is a lovely palm. The hate on here is funny. While I don't want a ton of them in monoculture, they look good mixed in with other palms, especially in zone 9A.

I once felt the same way about sagos and Washingtonia. Then I saw them in habitat and gained a newfound respect for them. I feel similar about Butia - once thought they were the ugliest pinnate palms then saw pictures of tall ones lining the savannah in Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, etc. Now I just wish they grew faster. :P

  • Like 5
  • Upvote 1
Posted

The trachycarpus are the least tropical looking palms in my opinion

Nothing to say here. 

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, necturus said:

A healthy old queen is a lovely palm. The hate on here is funny. While I don't want a ton of them in monoculture, they look good mixed in with other palms, especially in zone 9A.

I once felt the same way about sagos and Washingtonia. Then I saw them in habitat and gained a newfound respect for them. I feel similar about Butia - once thought they were the ugliest pinnate palms then saw pictures of tall ones lining the savannah in Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, etc. Now I just wish they grew faster. :P

I could not agree with this comment more.

I think any palm looks great when its planted position does it justice. E.g. if it fits in well with it's surroundings. 

Look at the variety of common 9A+ palms that are growing at this kiwi property, the formal way the Queens are planted makes them look fantastic in my opinion:

I also think probably any palm would look great in its own natural habitat, e.g. trachycarpus or washingtonia.

Edited by sipalms
  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1
Posted

Ceroxylon quindiuense is kind of garbage /s

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 2

Oakley, California

55 Miles E-NE of San Francisco, CA

Solid zone 9, I can expect at least one night in the mid to low twenties every year.

Hot, dry summers. Cold, wet winters.

Posted

I remember these being sold along I-10 in East Texas about 15 years ago. Glad to see it appears that they have gone extinct!

tripleplam.jpeg

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, necturus said:

A healthy old queen is a lovely palm. The hate on here is funny. While I don't want a ton of them in monoculture, they look good mixed in with other palms, especially in zone 9A.

I once felt the same way about sagos and Washingtonia. Then I saw them in habitat and gained a newfound respect for them. I feel similar about Butia - once thought they were the ugliest pinnate palms then saw pictures of tall ones lining the savannah in Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, etc. Now I just wish they grew faster. :P

I couldn't agree with you more about Washingtonia.  Seeing the giant 100+ year old ones in the few canyons here in AZ where they're native made me love all of them.  Now easily one of my favorite palms.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Patrick said:

Ceroxylon quindiuense is kind of garbage /s

Strongly agree... 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Fusca said:

My choice would be Trachycarpus fortunei - at least locally here in Texas.   Here is an example of one that unfortunately is somewhat typical:

578e806a222f5_Trachycarpusfortunei.JPG.416fff0550deb1b88b2a75eac0f8959d.JPG

A neighbor here in Dallas grew the most beautiful Trachys I have seen anywhere... there are a few pretty ones in Dallas but most are so-so...  these had the most full crowns (until he chopped them) @ fairly good size nice wide tops... wind resistant and weather loving...  and just a few blocks away one of those tall spindly trunks with a tiny set of leaves on top lol...

I think some have just adapted better. I'm growing from my neighbors seed just to gift them later so that people arent growing too many of the depot trachys. It could be genetics or perhaps watering and being near a driveway or alot of concrete that traps moisture (or both)... a few types look great early but like crap when they get tall

Edited by DallasPalms
  • Like 1
Posted

Without a doubt it would be Rhapis excelsa.  Began planting them as a hedge years ago.  Now they trying to take over the world.  My walkways, under fence into neighbor's yard and out into my drive way as well.  Would LOVE to see them all go away in an instant.

20201208_141043.jpg

20201208_141107.jpg

20201208_141119.jpg

20201208_141211.jpg

2012-01-30.jpg

  • Like 5
  • Upvote 1

Steve

Born in the Bronx

Raised in Brooklyn

Matured In Wai`anae

I can't be held responsible for anything I say or do....LOL

Posted
1 hour ago, WaianaeCrider said:

Without a doubt it would be Rhapis excelsa.  Began planting them as a hedge years ago.  Now they trying to take over the world.  My walkways, under fence into neighbor's yard and out into my drive way as well.  Would LOVE to see them all go away in an instant.

20201208_141043.jpg

20201208_141107.jpg

20201208_141119.jpg

20201208_141211.jpg

2012-01-30.jpg

Trying to get a clump of Rhapis excelsis to grow in the shade like this in AZ.  Ain’t as easy here as for you there, lol

  • Upvote 1
Posted

This thread cracks me up !   One person's treasure is another's weed.  Wait till I post my Ceroxylon quindiuense !  :mrlooney:

  • Like 6
  • Upvote 1

San Francisco, California

Posted
5 hours ago, Darold Petty said:

Phoenix theophrasti    ( I recognize that some will value this palm for its frost hardiness. )  :hmm:  

  Most of the images online show a traditional single trunked palm, but as a juvenile it will sprout myriad growth points, producing an incoherent mess. 

It  is so viciously armed that it is hazardous to attempt pruning.

If you’re trying to keep out marauding meth heads its spininess makes it perfect.

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 2

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Posted

Worst palm species sounds like one those questions for which any answer gives another turn of The Rack. 
 

 

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 2

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Posted
49 minutes ago, DoomsDave said:

If you’re trying to keep out marauding meth heads its spininess makes it perfect.

That or Zombia.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

Queen palms, wouldnt waste dirt on them

  • Like 4
Posted

This might be weird considering that this is one of the few palm options I have without having to protect it to great lengths, but I don’t think Trachycarpus fortunei look that nice. I appreciate them a ton though, it’s really cool to have such a hardy trunking palm, and I don’t think it is completely ugly, but in the grand scheme of things they don’t really look that nice. It’s still cool to see a few around. Now I do believe that those ones grown in the Pacific Northwest look really good, when they have all of their fronds and they are super green. Same with some of the ones inland from North Carolina to Georgia, in that zone 7b/8a area, a lot of those look quite nice. I kind of wish that people in climates that get colder winters would would try protecting something else though, it seems to always be a Trachy, which of course makes sense with them being the hardiest trunking palm. I’ve been seeing quite a few pictures online recently of people protecting Washingtonia in even lower zones than me, and they grow back so fast in the summer and look really good. Why plant a Trachy and protect it when it is going to likely be beat up all the time (from the winter, high heat, or sometimes both) when you can plant a Washingtonia and have it look great with one month of regrowth, assuming you live somewhere with good summer heat? Just my thoughts, maybe I should say mainly Trachycarpus fortunei in boarderline places or places that get too hot for it. 

PalmTreeDude

Posted
4 hours ago, WaianaeCrider said:

Without a doubt it would be Rhapis excelsa.  Began planting them as a hedge years ago.  Now they trying to take over the world.  My walkways, under fence into neighbor's yard and out into my drive way as well.  Would LOVE to see them all go away in an instant.

20201208_141043.jpg

20201208_141107.jpg

20201208_141119.jpg

20201208_141211.jpg

2012-01-30.jpg

Thats a good problem to have. Pot the suckers up and sell them. They're worth a ton over here.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Millbrook, "Kinjarling" Noongar word meaning "Place of Rain", Rainbow Coast, Western Australia 35S. Warm temperate. Csb Koeppen Climate classification. Cool nights all year round.

 

 

Posted

Waiting for someone to start a PalmTalk war by responding to this thread with Cocos nucifera...

  • Like 6
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Patrick said:

Ceroxylon quindiuense is kind of garbage /s

That’s a shock! I think they’re incredibly awesome palms. All the Ceroxylon are. But then, you’re probably being sarcastic. 

Edited by Jim in Los Altos
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Jim in Los Altos, CA  SF Bay Area 37.34N- 122.13W- 190' above sea level

zone 10a/9b

sunset zone 16

300+ palms, 90+ species in the ground

Las Palmas Design

Facebook Page

Las Palmas Design & Associates

Elegant Homes and Gardens

Posted

I’ve already had several mature Trachycarpus fortunei removed. I love T. martianus (very tropical looking) and T. wagneriensis however. 

  • Upvote 2

Jim in Los Altos, CA  SF Bay Area 37.34N- 122.13W- 190' above sea level

zone 10a/9b

sunset zone 16

300+ palms, 90+ species in the ground

Las Palmas Design

Facebook Page

Las Palmas Design & Associates

Elegant Homes and Gardens

Posted

I really want to troll this thread too ... but I won't. :rolleyes:

I am assuming that Adam from Arizona genuinely wants to know what he should not plant.

I find that disagreeing with another persons opinion is not really helpful.

Well Adam, my experience here in Sydney, is probably of no value to you.

sorry that I cant help you.

Cheers Steve

It is not dead, it is just senescence.

   

 

 

Posted

I wouldn't say they are the worst palms, but i dont get peoples obsession with coconut palms especially trying to grow them outside of there zone.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ahosey01 said:

Waiting for someone to start a PalmTalk war by responding to this thread with Cocos nucifera...

Ha ha I honestly just read your post after posting that.

I must say i spend a lot of time in remote small Indonesian islands even have land there, and they are like weeds, hundreds of thousands possibly millions of them.

Edited by pigafetta
Posted

Fellas... c'mon... we know what the despicable species are.... haha... its OK to be honest .....:D
!/- Carpentaria
2/- Clumping Fishtail
3/- Coconuts
4/- Queen Palms ( although the reverse has happened in Darwin, there are so few of the cursed things, the new generations think they're 'cool' )
Mostly no one wants these up in Darwin, in fact there is a whole subset industry of tree loppers who specialise in palm removal.
5/- Cuban Royals get an honourable mention in the removal stakes... the Ganoderma fungus has decimated them in town as well.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...