Jump to content
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

The fate of Sydney's Queen Palms (Syagrus romanzoffiana) in pictures


Recommended Posts

Posted

Once planted en masse all around NSW, the Queen Palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana) has become one of the most unpopular palms around. My local Council does not require any permit on behalf of residents to remove them, unlike most trees. Councils, Gardening magazines and shows, and just about everyone else now loves to hate these palms. They have been blamed for everything from attracting roaches and vermin, invading bushland, the Indian Mynah invasion of Sydney, gloabal warming, and just about any other problem you can think of. Below are pictures of the fate of these palms nowadays that I happened to see:

post-5838-011914400 1325576836_thumb.jpg

post-5838-047272900 1325576868_thumb.jpg

(dumped faster than a one night stand)

post-5838-097169700 1325576973_thumb.jpg

(Soon to be removed)

While the palms are not self cleansing and may be establishing themselves in some places in South-East Queensland, I believe many of the problems attributed to the palms are greatly exaggerated. It seems Aussies are so quick to jump on the bandwagon when it comes to plants without really examining the claims.

Posted

Agree 2000000% . Councils are opting to pay a once-off fee to cut down the trees, rather than the more sensible (but more expensive long-term) option of removing the fruit each year before it ripens. Maybe it's a different situation in Queensland (shrug) - dunno.

The things that councils (and others) are blaming the Queen palm for - border on absurd. But seeing that Australian councils are involved here, that doesn't surprise me one little bit. I wish councils would concentrate on graffiti removal, footpath (sidewalk)/road maintenance and rubbish removal.

Regards

Michael.

Just north of Cairns, Australia....16 Deg S.
Tropical climate: from 19C to 34C.

Spending a lot of time in Manila, Philippines... 15 Deg N.
Tropical climate: from 24C to 35C.

Posted

Yes unfortunately they are being demonized everywhere......I would have to admit that I would be glad if there were none growing in this area but we are fortunate here to be able to grow just about any other palm we want to......down south it is a different matter and removal of Queen Palms in the southern states just takes away another option apart from the usual suspects that will grow in cooler climates.

Andrew,
Airlie Beach, Whitsundays

Tropical Queensland

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...