Jump to content
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted

I bought this and it was labeled Ceratozamia fuscoviridis.  The foliage was very juvenile if not infantile when I bought it.  This flush looks more like my Ceratozamia latifolia.  First is the flushing plant labeled as C fuscoviridis, followed by my two C latifolia.

Any one growing a confirmed C fuscoviridis who can shed some light on the id?

20180809-104A0236.jpg

20121019-IMG_0534.jpg

20170608-104A6653.jpg

  • Upvote 2

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Posted

This thread will probably require the help of Tom @cycadjungle

Posted

Looks right. It’s closely related to Mexicana. If you google C. ‘Molango’ you will find more info as that’s what it use to be called. 

  • Upvote 1

Len

Vista, CA (Zone 10a)

Shadowridge Area

"Show me your garden and I shall tell you what you are."

-- Alfred Austin

Posted
On 8/10/2018, 12:06:37, LJG said:

Looks right. It’s closely related to Mexicana. If you google C. ‘Molango’ you will find more info as that’s what it use to be called. 

I did look up Ceratozamia fuscovirdis description on Cycad.org, and was reading about the leaflets which shouldn't be as wide: "

Leaflets alternate or opposite, sessile, with slightly decurrent bases at point of attachment, from thirty to forty pairs, eight to ten inches long, two-thirds of an inch wide in the central portion, where the margin are slightly raised, entire, fuscous on the under side, dull green on the upper side, subfalcate, tapering to a sharp point, which is slightly
reflexed, nerved with eighteen to twenty obscure nerves."

While mine is still young, it appears to be much wider like my C. latifolia, drastically different than my C mexicana or C pacifica which have the narrower leaflets (fuscovirids flushing and mature latifolia pictured).

20180811-104A0248.jpg

20180811-104A0249.jpg

20180811-104A0250.jpg

20180811-104A0259.jpg

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Posted

Sounds like the description of the leaflet should be narrower for C fuscavirdis closer to C mexicana and C pacifica pictured below.

20180811-104A0253.jpg

20180811-104A0257.jpg

20180811-104A0255.jpg

20180811-104A0258.jpg

  • Upvote 1

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Posted

shots of Loran's old plant (assuming it's now somewhere in the Huntington?)

ceratozamia fuscoviridis W (aka redback).jpg

Ceratozamia fuscoviridis new leaf underside W.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted
5 hours ago, Geoff said:

 

shots of Loran's old plant

 

Thank you for sharing those photos Geoff!  Unless my little plant starts putting out a bit narrower leaflets and a lot more leaflets per leaf as it grow, it appears to me that mine is not the same as Loran's.  I like it all the same, it will just be nice to know what it really is.  Patience is the name of the game and see if it continues to morph over time.

I have only been to the Huntington once since Loran's collection was moved and not everything had been planted according to the staff I spoke to at the time.  I wonder if there is or ever will be a guide to his collection and where the plants were integrated into the gardens.  It was such a great donation!  I was lucky enough to get to that last Palm Society meeting held at his home before he passed.  Such an inspiration it was!

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Posted

I see more of the characteristics of my C latifolia (third photo down) in this plant I aquired as C fuscovirdis than with the plant of Loran's.  The latifolia does flush a more red hue than chocolate, but that could be due to different light, nutrition or some other factor.  The purported C fuscovirdis is hardening off, so the leaflets are close to fully mature in size for this flush.

20180819-104A0302.jpg

20180819-104A0303.jpg

20180819_184412.jpg

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...