Jump to content
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT LOGGING IN ×
  • WELCOME GUEST

    It looks as if you are viewing PalmTalk as an unregistered Guest.

    Please consider registering so as to take better advantage of our vast knowledge base and friendly community.  By registering you will gain access to many features - among them are our powerful Search feature, the ability to Private Message other Users, and be able to post and/or answer questions from all over the world. It is completely free, no “catches,” and you will have complete control over how you wish to use this site.

    PalmTalk is sponsored by the International Palm Society. - an organization dedicated to learning everything about and enjoying palm trees (and their companion plants) while conserving endangered palm species and habitat worldwide. Please take the time to know us all better and register.

    guest Renda04.jpg

Caryota no in Southern California


Tracy

Recommended Posts

Having heard from Dooms Dave that I shouldn't be surprised if my Caryota no does not survive here in coastal Southern California, I thought I would ask and see if anyone else is growing it nearby or has tried it in the coastal zone of So Cal.  Mine has survived for a couple of mild winters in a pot, even hosting a humming bird nest one time.  At the end of this summer I finally got it in the ground and it seems to be adjusting well, even pushing a new spike up this last several weeks (even through last month's cold spell).  Anyone have any recent experiences or photos to share?

20160216-104A1019.jpg

  • Upvote 2

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that in your coastal zone, you should be fine. I've been growing a palm purchased as Caryota basconensis (originally from Floribunda). It was less cold hardy as a seedling, spotting badly during winters, but after several years seems to be "hardening up",  & on it's way. I think that your C. no should do similarly. 

Bret

 

Coastal canyon area of San Diego

 

"In the shadow of the Cross"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, quaman58 said:

Btw, what's the Cycad to the right of it?

It is a Cycas thouarsii x cupida I got from George Sparkman.  The early morning light of the photo doesn't do the color justice, as it has a noticeable blue tint when compared to a straight thouarsii.  It's another plant which was cultivated in a pot in my Carlsbad garden waiting patiently to get in the ground in Leucadia.  I have tried to balance my garden water needs by planting many cycads, aloes, and a few agave's to balance the needs of my more thirsty plants.

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tracy!

Prove me wrong!

Sometimes the coast has the most . . . .

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DoomsDave said:

Tracy!

Prove me wrong!

Sometimes the coast has the most . . . .

In this case, I'm hoping I can prove you wrong.  My wife's favorite palm in the Carlsbad yard was the Caryota gigas, so this was the substitute in the new garden.  I will be in trouble if it doesn't survive!

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gigas is a much easier grow here.

No is a bit smaller, isn't it?

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DoomsDave said:

No is a bit smaller, isn't it

That was my understanding and the reason for switching.  It allows me to stuff more in a small space.

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of a few people growing Caryota No in Encinitas that seem to be doing fine so far.  I've seen some incredible Urens too if the No doesn't work out.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know nothing about growing palms in California but am glad to read here that yours may do well.

I am a fan of both C. gigas and C. no at least when they are small.

Even though I have mine side by side they look similar. Your post gave me an excuse to take a break from cleaning prior to the arrival of some visitors and trek for some photos.

Here is Caryota no.

DSCN9576.thumb.jpg.117de9c5f2961c3e31b28DSCN9575.thumb.JPG.e0d1a1b32810bcab95b96

 

 

 

  • Upvote 3

Cindy Adair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next is C. gigas followed by a closeup of the much narrower leaflets of the clustering C. mitis for comparison.DSCN9579.thumb.jpg.a64f53710693b1d3e082b

DSCN9580.thumb.jpg.b7232ce31ccec9cd4690f

DSCN9589.JPG

  • Upvote 2

Cindy Adair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good Tracy.  I've always been told that C. no is a "no go" for us in SoCal, so you must be doing something right.  I have a few different unknown Caryota and one thing I've learned is to keep them well fertilized, especially with lots of iron and that helps keep them from yellowing out, which they're prone to doing.

Matt Bradford

"Manambe Lavaka"

Spring Valley, CA (8.5 miles inland from San Diego Bay)

10B on the hill (635 ft. elevation)

9B in the canyon (520 ft. elevation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Cindy Adair said:

Next is C. gigas followed by a closeup of the much narrower leaflets of the clustering C. mitis for comparison.

Thanks for sharing those photos Cindy.  I have both the C no in the new garden in mostly full sun, and only small parts of the C gigas in my other home ever get any shade (varies with the time of year).  Matty is right, I need to give both a bit more fertilizer, but its tough to feed the gigas as it is on a slope, and time released tends to run to the base of the slope.

20151226-104A0572 s.jpg

  • Upvote 3

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend who lives in Anaheim sent me this photo of a Caryota to identify.  This is near his home in Anaheim, CA.  It is clearly smaller than a C gigas, and doesn't have the dark trunk that gigas has.  I am guessing it is C no.  No? Si? Maybe?

IMG_1141 Caryota near Ivan.jpg

  • Upvote 2

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tracy said:

A friend who lives in Anaheim sent me this photo of a Caryota to identify.  This is near his home in Anaheim, CA.  It is clearly smaller than a C gigas, and doesn't have the dark trunk that gigas has.  I am guessing it is C no.  No? Si? Maybe?

IMG_1141 Caryota near Ivan.jpg

Yes, that looks like a no!

 

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tracy said:

A friend who lives in Anaheim sent me this photo of a Caryota to identify.  This is near his home in Anaheim, CA.  It is clearly smaller than a C gigas, and doesn't have the dark trunk that gigas has.  I am guessing it is C no.  No? Si? Maybe?

IMG_1141 Caryota near Ivan.jpg

Looking good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 2/16/2016, 6:45:06, Tracy said:

Having heard from Dooms Dave that I shouldn't be surprised if my Caryota no does not survive here in coastal Southern California, I thought I would ask and see if anyone else is growing it nearby or has tried it in the coastal zone of So Cal.  Mine has survived for a couple of mild winters in a pot, even hosting a humming bird nest one time.  At the end of this summer I finally got it in the ground and it seems to be adjusting well, even pushing a new spike up this last several weeks (even through last month's cold spell).

Bump... it is still surviving and doing well here in coastal San Diego County I am happy to say.  I can already see that there will be substantial space between the rings when the first couple of leaves are dropped.

20170819-104A7244.jpg

  • Upvote 6

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tracy,

That has had some significant growth.

Did you change how you were fertilizing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Palm Tree Jim said:

That has had some significant growth.

Did you change how you were fertilizing?

No change in fertilizer regime, but it often gets a little extra water when I rinse sand off my feet when I get home from a surf!  It is right inside the gate, very close to the first hose bib in the back yard.  It seems that it can't get too much water.  Relative to the growth, I think it was just waiting to get into the ground more than anything.  It is a vigorous grower!

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

With the new edition of the Palm Society of Southern California, Palm Journal Issue 214 arriving, with an emphasis on Arenga, Caryota & Wallichia, I was reviewing my Caryota again.  I had hoped that my Caryota would start growing longer rachis off which the bi-pinnate sub-rachis are grown and leaflets are carried (not sure if my botanical description is accurate, but you probably understand what I mean).  At this stage it is resembling a Caryota urens which grows very vertically with short bipinnate leaves (fronds) coming off the trunk.  I liked the long leaf spread on my Caryota gigas, but just wanted a junior size of it in my new garden, which is what I thought a Caryota no would resemble. 
Finally, given comments in one of the Journal's articles that Caryota no is a "no go" in Southern California, I'm wondering if the seeds were mislabeled and mine isn't Caryota no.  So if you live somewhere that Caryota no grows well and have seen them at a similar size as mine, I'm hoping for your opinion as to whether this looks like "no" or something else (possibly urens).  It does have a distinctive droop at the end of the main rachis, which you will see in a couple of the photos posted below.  If you are growing Caryota no in Southern California, I would encourage you to share your experience and photos as well.

20171121-104A7929.jpg

20171121-104A7926.jpg

20171121-104A7931.jpg

20171121-104A7932.jpg

20171121-104A7933.jpg

20171121-104A7934.jpg

  • Upvote 7

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a crappy picture, but here are mine, which I figure are Urens and a similar size to yours. You can see a similar level of droop.

APC_0567.jpg

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Matt in OC said:

here are mine, which I figure are Urens and a similar size to yours. You can see a similar level of droop.

Thank you Matt.  Yours are bigger, but mine definitely resembles yours more than some of the habitat photos I found of the real Caryota no.:(   It is what it is, but I'll still hold out hope for a little while longer.  I went to 100% certain it was Caryota no, to uncertain, to leaning toward Caryota urens in a span of less than 6 months.  As rapid as Caryotas grow at this stage, I'll probably get a good indication if it is C urens within another year.

I'll entertain other views either way.

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 11/21/2017, 2:14:39, Matt in OC said:

 

It's a crappy picture, but here are mine, which I figure are Urens and a similar size to yours.

 

So while I have given up on the plant originally posted in this string being a Caryota no, I am trying again.  The original plant I definitely would say is Caryota urens.  I did just plant another young Caryota, which I bought as Caryota no.  I don't recall what the C. urens looked like at this stage, before going bi-pinnate, but I don't remember being impressed on the large single leaflets.  This does have large single leaflets still, so I have hope.  It's like starting the clock ticking again, with a reset.  I'm hopeful this will turn out to be the real thing:  Caryota no.

20180115-104A8304.jpg

20180115-104A8304-2.jpg

  • Upvote 3

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen large Caryotas in Santa Monica, and there are a few giant ones here in Palos Verdes Estates, on the cliff, facing the Pacific. And they are huge.

Here are a few screenshots of the ones in Palos Verdes, they were taken about two years ago on Google Maps. They are bigger now. The one in the back looks smaller because it sits lower on the cliff, but it is just a large. 

Screen Shot 2018-01-15 at 4.07.13 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-15 at 4.07.25 PM.png

Edited by Panamajack
added photos
  • Upvote 2

Palos Verdes Estates - coastal Los Angeles - 33°45'N 118°24'W

On a cliff, 2 blocks from the Pacific Ocean. Zone 10b - Sunset zone 24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Panamajack those look like big-ass gigas.

  • Upvote 1

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DoomsDave said:

@Panamajack those look like big-ass gigas.

You got it Dave.  I think I mentioned at the beginning of this thread that I intentionally didn't put the Caryota gigas in the new garden, even though its still my wife's favorite in the old garden.  I just didn't want to commit the space to it again.  I will be disappointed if this turns out to be another Caryota urens, but I won't know unless I try;).  Right?  They grow so much faster in the ground than in pots and since I really "wanna know" or "want a no", planting was the fastest route to discovery.

  • Upvote 2

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tracy said:

You got it Dave.  I think I mentioned at the beginning of this thread that I intentionally didn't put the Caryota gigas in the new garden, even though its still my wife's favorite in the old garden.  I just didn't want to commit the space to it again.  I will be disappointed if this turns out to be another Caryota urens, but I won't know unless I try;).  Right?  They grow so much faster in the ground than in pots and since I really "wanna know" or "want a no", planting was the fastest route to discovery.

If your no grows, and it's a no, I'll suspect witchcraft or sorcery.

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DoomsDave said:

If your no grows, and it's a no, I'll suspect witchcraft or sorcery.

"No" way... I would never do that.  Well if it doesn't make it, maybe that in itself would be an indication it's a C. no.  The bananas are out of this spot, so I'll get an opportunity to try something else if its a "no-go".

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tracy said:

"No" way... I would never do that.  Well if it doesn't make it, maybe that in itself would be an indication it's a C. no.  The bananas are out of this spot, so I'll get an opportunity to try something else if its a "no-go".

If it's a no, and it grows, it will be a Pilgrimage PalmTM!

It will also likely take the same amount of space as a Big Ass Gigas.

http://www.palmpedia.net/wiki/Caryota_no

400px-Cnimg_6514.jpg400px-Cnimg_6514.jpg

400px-Cnimg_6514.jpg400px-Cnimg_6514.jpg

  • Upvote 1

Let's keep our forum fun and friendly.

Any data in this post is provided 'as is' and in no event shall I be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, damages resulting from accuracy or lack thereof, insult, or lost profits or revenue, claims by third parties or for other similar costs, or any special, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of my opinion or the use of this data. The accuracy or reliability of the data is not guaranteed or warranted in any way and I disclaim liability of any kind whatsoever, including, without limitation, liability for quality, performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose arising out of the use, or inability to use my data. Other terms may apply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panamajack said:

I've seen large Caryotas in Santa Monica, and there are a few giant ones here in Palos Verdes Estates, on the cliff, facing the Pacific. And they are huge.

Here are a few screenshots of the ones in Palos Verdes, they were taken about two years ago on Google Maps. They are bigger now. The one in the back looks smaller because it sits lower on the cliff, but it is just a large. 

Screen Shot 2018-01-15 at 4.07.13 PM.png

Screen Shot 2018-01-15 at 4.07.25 PM.png

This is a project i did for friends of mine about 15 years ago! There are a number of rare palms we installed in this garden!

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, neoflora said:

This is a project i did for friends of mine about 15 years ago! There are a number of rare palms we installed in this garden!

 

Wow, you did a fantastic job! I love driving by that house and seeing those beautiful palms on my way to/from home. Really nice job! They are all huge and very healthy.

Palos Verdes Estates - coastal Los Angeles - 33°45'N 118°24'W

On a cliff, 2 blocks from the Pacific Ocean. Zone 10b - Sunset zone 24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On 1/15/2018, 6:07:04, DoomsDave said:

If it's a no, and it grows, it will be a Pilgrimage PalmTM!

Still can't tell anything about the new Caryota yet, as its not even bipinnate yet.  The other one I'm wondering if it's Caryota ochlandra, Caryota urens or even Caryota maxima.  Leaf tips are droopy, but that seems to be the case with all three mentioned.  Compared to the massive girth of my Caryota gigas's trunk this is relatively narrow for its height.  This does have a little fuzz on the ringed trunk, which rubs off with time or too much blasting with the hose (which happens when watering my orchids hanging from it at times).  What they yee:  ochlandra, urens or maxima???

20180806-104A0214.jpg

20180806-104A0219.jpg

  • Upvote 3

33.0782 North -117.305 West  at 72 feet elevation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tracy said:

Still can't tell anything about the new Caryota yet, as its not even bipinnate yet.  The other one I'm wondering if it's Caryota ochlandra, Caryota urens or even Caryota maxima.  Leaf tips are droopy, but that seems to be the case with all three mentioned.  Compared to the massive girth of my Caryota gigas's trunk this is relatively narrow for its height.  This does have a little fuzz on the ringed trunk, which rubs off with time or too much blasting with the hose (which happens when watering my orchids hanging from it at times).  What they yee:  ochlandra, urens or maxima???

20180806-104A0214.jpg

20180806-104A0219.jpg

Caryota leucadiana var spectacularis. No doubt. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...